Paradox of the Arrow of Graceli.

the arrow is at rest in relation to the space it occupies in each minute and continuous phase of its body.

But, the inertia has changed from: at rest to inertia in motion.

As is also the linear or centrifugal momentum [if it is in curved motion, or the arrow is curved].

If you have the relation of the continuum to the discontinuous [the two at the same time] [Graceli].
  The space occupied of itself in relation to the movement [Zeno]. As if he were at rest, where he contests whether the movement exists.

If there is inertia as agent and phenomenon about displacement. Where it changes from the condition of inertia of rest to inertia in motion [Graceli].

And the question of linear or centrifugal momentum, where it confirms the movement of the arrow [Graceli].

and the electrons and energy interactions that are variable with the motions.

Or in relation to the references inside and outside the arrow, which goes back to the relativities of Galileo and Einstein.




Paradox of the Arrow of Graceli.

the arrow is at rest in relation to the space it occupies in each minute and continuous phase of its body.

But, the inertia has changed from: at rest to inertia in motion.

As is also the linear or centrifugal momentum [if it is in curved motion, or the arrow is curved].

If you have the relation of the continuum to the discontinuous [the two at the same time] [Graceli].
  The space occupied of itself in relation to the movement [Zeno]. As if he were at rest, where he contests whether the movement exists.

If there is inertia as agent and phenomenon about displacement. Where it changes from the condition of inertia of rest to inertia in motion [Graceli].

And the question of linear or centrifugal momentum, where it confirms the movement of the arrow [Graceli].

and the electrons and energy interactions that are variable with the motions.

Or in relation to the references inside and outside the arrow, which goes back to the relativities of Galileo and Einstein.